Tuesday, March 24, 2009

高尔夫挥杆的单平面和双平面


  曾经和好几位PGA的职业教练学习或者探讨过高尔夫挥杆理论,他们都是真正的专家,有着丰富的教学经验和实战理论,但好象还没有两个人的说法完全一样的,每个人都有自己的特点和见解,每个人都可以给你一些不同的说法和窍门,而且有些方法和窍门竟然是互相矛盾或者相斥的,我想学习高尔夫挥杆最大的沮丧也莫过于此了。不知道其它的体育运动,比如游泳田径什么的,是否有一套标准的训练方法或者动作理论可以全世界通用,好象高尔夫还没有,不过就目前来看,两个平面的理论我认为应该是比较有借鉴作用的。

  其实两个平面的理论不难理解,简单来说,人体挥杆时会产生两个主要的平面,一个是身体或者说肩部旋转的平面,另外一个就是手臂挥杆的平面。如果这两个平面相吻合,就是单平面的挥杆,如果这两个平面不重合而是手臂挥杆的平面比肩部转动的平面更陡直,则是双平面的挥杆。



  根据该理论的鼻祖Jim Hardy的说法,这两种不同的平面挥杆方法是截然不同的,好象油和水之间的关系,如果你一直为你的挥杆苦恼不已的话,很有可能就是你还没有了解自己的挥杆是属于哪一种并且按照相应的正确方法去练习。

  两种挥杆平面在握杆,站位,瞄球,上挥和下挥等环节上都有或多或少的差别,我个人通过实际练习体会到最主要的区别还是在上挥。单平面挥杆的上挥是手臂和肩部严格围绕身体的中轴线来同步绕转,保持两者在同一平面上。而双平面在上杆的时候在肩部扭转的同时胯部也有一定幅度的转动,同时手臂挥杆的方向更靠近外侧,也就是远离身体的一侧,从而形成一个更宽但比较陡直的上杆平面。在上挥的顶点,我们可以清楚地看到,单平面的挥杆双手的位置基本和右肩持平,同时感觉右臂同身体夹紧并右肘朝下,而双平面的挥杆双手的位置会高于右肩,同时右肘向外微张。

  下杆的时候单平面挥杆只要原路返回即可,而双平面挥杆则要先把手臂拉回到和身体的同一平面,再释放杆头击球,两者是不同的。所以如果你的教练要你夹着毛巾练习挥杆,他教的是单平面,如果你的教练要你下杆时先收杆再送杆,他教的是双平面。如果他要求你上杆时夹紧右臂而下杆要有意识旋转手腕释放杆头的话,那么他就有李鬼的嫌疑了。

  我认为,对于单平面还是双平面的选择,绝对是个人的偏爱。一般来说,身高臂长的人士比较适合双平面,有利于发挥自己手臂力量的优势,而身材不高或者体形敦实的人士,可以考虑选择单平面,发挥上身扭转的力量。其实我们会看到很多职业选手的挥杆并不是严格意义的单平面或者双平面,但他们的挥杆都是适合自己的身体情况的。对于初学者,你是选择单平面还是双平面并不重要,重要的是理解正确的理论并在正确的指导下练习,否则越打越胡涂最后发展到好象不会打球的情况会不断的重演。

Sunday, March 22, 2009

Monday, March 9, 2009

Moe Knows What Nobody Else Knows

Moe Knows What Nobody Else Knows by David Owen Part One

Sam Snead played an exhibition match with Ed (Porky) Oliver and Moe Norman in Toronto in 1969. On one par-4 hole, a creek crossed the fairway about 240 yards from the tee. Norman, a Canadian pro who lived in the area, reached for his driver.

"This is a lay-up hole, Moe," Snead warned him. "You can't clear the creek with a driver." "Not trying to," Norman said. "I'm playing for the bridge." Snead's and Oliver's tee shots ended up safely on the near side of the water. Norman's drive landed short and rolled over the bridge to the other side.

Every golfer hits a lucky shot from time to time. But Norman, who recently turned 66, has hit so many lucky shots during the last half-century that you begin to search for a different adjective.

Consider Norman's experience during a practice round before the 1971 Canadian Open. A week earlier, at the Quebec Open, he had come to the final hole with a one-stroke lead, but had four-putted the final green to finish second. (His playing partner, Gary Slatter, explained later that Norman putted poorly on the hole because he was upset that the crowd had not applauded him for being the only player that day to reach that green in two.) "Any four-putts today?" a reporter asked Norman as he came to the tee of a 233-yard par 3. Norman teed up a ball in silence and hit it straight at the pin. He watched the ball's flight a moment, then turned to the reporter and said, "Not putting today." The ball landed on the front of the green and rolled into the cup.

Norman is mostly unknown to American golf fans, but he has long been a nearly mythical figure among tour professionals. Paul Azinger first saw him hit balls on a driving range in Florida 15 years ago when Azinger was a college player.

"He started ripping these drivers right off the ground at the 250-yard marker, and he never hit one more than 10 yards to either side of it, and he hit at least 50," Azinger told Tim O'Connor, a Canadian writer whose forthcoming biography of Norman, A Feeling of Greatness, is excerpted in the December issue of Golf Digest. "It was an incredible sight. When he hit irons, he was calling how many times you would see it bounce after he hit it--sometimes before he hit it--and he'd do it. It was unbelievable," said Azinger.

At an exhibition once, Norman hit 1,540 drives in a little under seven hours. None was shorter than 225 yards, and all landed inside a marked 30-yard-wide landing zone.

Norman doesn't look like a legend. His graying red hair stands more or less straight up, giving him a look of perpetual surprise. He wears long-sleeved shirts in even the hottest weather, and he buttons them up to his chin. His pants don't fit very well; during his playing days, they often gave out just south of mid-shin.

He likes bright colors and enjoys mixing stripes and plaids. His teeth would give an orthodontist pause. A huge proportion of his daily caloric intake is in the form of Coca-Cola. His voice is high; he speaks rapidly and often repeats himself, especially when he's nervous. But Iron Byron doesn't have much star quality, either. Professional golfers' high regard for Norman has always been based primarily on his phenomenal ball striking. Lee Trevino ranks Norman with the game's very best, including Ben Hogan and Byron Nelson.

Ken Venturi agrees: "Because Moe is kind of eccentric, he never got the credit he deserved or played the kind of golf he was capable of. You had to ignore the way he looked over the ball and judge his ball striking. Hogan, Snead, Nelson--they all look esthetic. Moe looked very awkward. But he could do anything. He is one of the premier ball-strikers I have ever seen. Hell, I'd give Moe three strokes a side just to watch him hit the golf ball."

In his heyday, Norman translated his ball-striking genius into an impressive competitive record. In the late '50s, he won dozens of amateur tournaments in Canada, including the Canadian Amateur two years in a row. His best year as a pro was 1966, when he won five of the 12 Canadian tournaments he entered, came in second in five, finished no lower than fifth, and won the CPGA scoring-average title by 2 1/2 strokes, with 69.8.

Beginning in 1979, when Norman turned 50, he won seven consecutive Canadian PGA senior championships, finished second in the eighth, and won the ninth by eight strokes. He has set more than 30 course records, including three with scores of 59 and four with scores of 61. (He shot his most recent 59 four years ago, at the age of 62.) Last August, the Royal Canadian Golf Association inducted him into the Canadian Golf Hall of Fame.

These are considerable accomplishments. Still, there are conspicuous gaps in Norman's record. He played almost exclusively in Canada and made only a brief attempt, in 1959, to play on the U.S. tour. If Norman is one of the greatest ball-strikers in history, why doesn't he also have one of the greatest records?

The reasons are complex. One of them, paradoxically, has to do with the very foundation of his game: his golf swing. Simply put, Moe Norman's swing doesn't look like the ones you see on TV. He grips the club in his palms rather than his fingers, stands far from the ball with his legs spread wide; he soles the club as much as a foot behind the ball, squeezes the grip almost unbelievably hard with his left hand, takes the club back scarcely past the level of his right shoulder, makes only a moderate shoulder turn and virtually no hip turn, and finishes with the club pointing up at the sky. Nearly every time Norman teed it up in a tournament, he had to endure the laughter of spectators. He was often viewed as an amusing sideshow, not as the main event, and he reinforced his own reputation as a clown by playing to the galleries.

Norman is different in other ways as well. His personality is eccentric, to say the least. He is uncomfortable with strangers and has difficulty making eye contact with people he doesn't know. He does not like to be touched. He has never married or had a serious relationship with another person, and he has essentially no interests outside golf. He suffers from a crippling shyness that was often interpreted by others as arrogance or rudeness. Despite all he has accomplished, he has always been plagued by a fear that he doesn't measure up.

That Norman managed any sort of competitive career can begin to seem astonishing. His upbringing was modest in the extreme and did little to prepare him for the U.S. tour, where he felt conspicuous and inadequate next to famous players who dressed better and had more money than he did. He spent much of his 40-year competitive career in obscurity and poverty. He never had a mentor, a manager, or a sponsor. He sometimes carried his own bag in tournaments because he couldn't afford a caddie. When he had money, he kept it in a wad in his front pocket and sometimes had to move it to one side so it wouldn't interfere with his putting stroke. He spent 14 winters--including the one before the 1956 Masters, to which he had been invited as the reigning Canadian Amateur champion--setting pins in a bowling alley for a few cents a line. As recently as eight years ago, he was so broke that only the last-minute intervention of friends prevented his car from being repossessed. At that time, he was eking out a subsistence living by giving golf clinics for a couple of hundred dollars apiece. Even today, Norman lives in a $400-a-month motel room and has no telephone. He keeps his clothes in the back seat of his car.

Norman might be destitute and forgotten were it not for the efforts over the years of a few close friends. Among those friends are Gus and Audrey Maue. Gus Maue has known Norman for more than 40 years, and for a time was the pro at a golf club where Norman had caddied as a boy. Today, Maue owns Foxwood Golf Club, in Baden, Ontario, where Norman spends most of his days during the warm months. (He spends his winters in Florida, where he plays at a golf club owned by the Canadian PGA.) In 1987, the Maues conducted a golf tournament at Foxwood, which raised $25,000 for Norman and put him back on his feet.

For Audrey Maue, the key to understanding Norman came several years later, in a movie theater. "We went to see Rain Man," she said, "and suddenly it came to me: that's Moe. It just seemed like a light was turned on. I had always known that Moe was different, and I had known a little about autism, but I had never thought about it in connection with Moe. I don't know that he's ever seen a doctor, about that or anything else, but everyone who knows him who saw the movie felt the very same way. "Most people don't understand where Moe's coming from or why he is like he is. Life has always been a struggle for him. Just to be around people, period, made him feel uncomfortable. What he accomplished, he accomplished on his own."

Part Two

When you first see Moe Norman hit a golf ball you wonder, Why on earth does he swing the club that way? After you have watched him hit half a dozen 250-yard drives out of a divot, though, you begin to wonder, Why on earth don't I?

On the practice tee at Foxwood Golf Club not long ago, Norman warmed up with a pitching wedge, although "warming up" doesn't really describe any part of Norman's practice routine. The first shot was perfect, the second was identical to the first, the third to the second, and so on. Then he switched to his 4-iron. His swing--for all appearances, a nearly effortless half-swing--was the same with the 4-iron as it had been with the wedge. The shots came one after another, just three or four seconds apart. "How far you hitting those?" a spectator asked. "One-eighty," Norman said. Every shot was within a few degrees of dead straight, despite a stiff crosswind, unless he announced ahead of time that he was going to hit a draw or a fade. The divots were identical (surreally rectangular scrapes that Norman calls "bacon strips.")

Norman switched to his driver. Once again, the swing was the same. If you watched only his arms and hands, you wouldn't know that he wasn't still swinging his wedge. After hitting one ball, he would watch it a moment, then bend over and place another on the tee--and I mean place it. The tee never came out of the ground. In fact, it didn't move a millimeter.

"I hit balls, not tees," he explained. On a driving range once, he hit 131 drives in a row from the same tee without having to straighten or adjust it. In tournaments, he sometimes entertained galleries by hitting drives from the mouth of the bottle of Coke he had just been drinking.

"When was the last time you hit a bad shot, Moe?" I asked him.

"Thirty years ago," he said as he bent over to tee up another.

After he had been hitting drives awhile, a friend of his asked if he could try. The friend took Norman's driver and placed a ball on Norman's tee. The shot wasn't too bad, but the tee came out of the ground and tumbled into the long grass 20 feet ahead.

"Oh, dear, I loved that tee," Norman said wistfully. "I had it for seven years."

Before Norman's demonstration on the practice tee, he and I had spent some time together in Foxwood's unpretentious dining room. It was there, about a month before, that he had been inducted into the Canadian Golf Hall of Fame. The audience at Norman's induction was limited mostly to friends. At his request, the dinner was served family style.

As we talked, Norman held a putter and fiddled with his grip, or rolled a golf ball in his palm. He often finds it easier to be with children than with adults, and if a child is present he will sometimes pull a ball from his pocket and start an impromptu game of catch. I had been told that it might be hard to get him to talk, but that once he had started, it might be hard to get him to stop. He didn't look me in the eye at first, but gradually he seemed to relax. Bit by bit, with numerous digressions--all of them related to golf--he told me about his life.

"It's tough to do things when you're broke," he said. "Hitchhiking to tournaments, sleeping on park benches, sleeping in bunkers. I slept in bunkers all over Canada. You name it. I'd go and shoot 61 or 65, win the tournament, then hitchhike back on the highway with my TV set or whatever my first prize was, soaking wet. Couldn't afford an umbrella then. Sometimes I had to put my golf bag over my head. Nobody would come to my rescue, not back then. This was back in the early '50s. I was born in '29."

Norman grew up in a small house in a working-class neighborhood in Kitchener, an industrial city about 1 1/2 hours outside Toronto. The house was just 1 1/2 blocks from a Uniroyal Tire factory. The sky was often black, the air smelled of burning rubber. Money was very tight.

Norman's grade-school years were difficult. He had trouble getting along with other children and with other members of his family. He struggled in all subjects at school, except math, at which he was a prodigy. He also had a phenomenal memory. Today, he can recite the yardage of virtually every golf hole he has ever played, and he remembers every golf shot from every tournament that meant anything to him. He has a reputation as a deadly cribbage player because he remembers all the cards.

When Norman was a child, other children teased him mercilessly over his academic difficulties, his shyness, his big ears, his high voice, and his tendency to repeat himself.

An expert quoted in O'Connor's book speculates that Norman's speech and personality quirks, and even his unusual mathematical ability, may have arisen not from the mild autism that Audrey Maue suspects, but from untreated head injuries he may have suffered in a sledding accident when he was five. In that accident, he was dragged under a car a long distance, and he says he remembers seeing a tire roll over the side of his face. His parents could not afford to take him to the hospital, and his mother worried for the rest of her life that the accident had made a permanent change in her son's personality. Whatever the reason, Norman's childhood was mostly lonely. He found refuge in sports, and especially in golf, which he pursued with a devotion verging on mania.

Norman's first golf club was a tree branch he and his older brother used to knock balls around their yard; his second was a hockey stick. At the age of 12, he began caddying at a local club called Westmount. He bought his first real golf club, an old 5-iron, from a member who let him pay it off at 10 cents a week. "Oh, I was as happy as a pig in s---," he told me. "I had a steel-shafted club." Norman was left-handed, but the member was right-handed, so he switched.

Norman practiced in his family's tiny backyard by hitting balls against a neighbor's garage. He rapidly developed a local reputation as a golf terrorist. When he would break a neighbor's window--as he did 11 times in two years, usually because he was aiming at one--he would shout, "Bull's-eye!" He built his golf game against enormous odds. The other members of his family made fun of him for playing what they viewed as an effeminate game and called him a sissy at the dinner table.

Norman told me: "My father used to say, 'Come on, play a man's game. Play hockey or baseball.' I said, 'No, Dad, I'm too light.' I was a little skinny kid then, wasn't over 130 pounds. I couldn't play any other sport and be good at it so I kept playing golf. But my father wouldn't let me bring my clubs into the house. I had to hide them under the front porch."

When he wasn't aiming at the neighbors' windows, Norman practiced in a field at a nearby public course. When I referred to this field as a driving range, Norman laughed. "Nobody had ranges then," he said. "It was only a field, maybe 200 yards long. I had to wait till there was nobody playing to hit my driver. And the grass was tall. We had to use our irons to cut the grass down to fairway height, in a little square, and hit our balls from that."

Norman carried his cherished collection of battered golf balls in an old canvas bowling bag. After he had hit them all, he would drop the bag among them and chip into it. Fear of losing his balls in the tall grass increased his desire to hit straight shots. He often hit balls until his hands were bleeding. When the blood made his grip slippery, he wiped hands on his golf towel and his pants, and kept hitting balls until it was too dark to see. When he got home, he looked as though he had spent the afternoon slaughtering chickens.

Norman assembled his swing by feel, with a few clues gleaned from photographs in newspapers and magazines, and occasional encouragement from a kindly local pro. His progress was not immediate; he didn't break 100 until he was 16. But gradually his golf game fell into place. By the time he was 19, he felt he had his swing "trapped." From that point forward, he says, "I knew I could hit a golf ball where I wanted it to go for the rest of my life."

Part Three

The first significant step in Norman's competitive career came in 1949 at the St. Thomas Golf and Country Club, at a one-day amateur event later known as the Early Bird. He had not been invited. He showed up the day of the tournament and was given an empty slot. He was wearing sneakers. He had just seven clubs and carried them in his own bag, which was falling apart. Against a field that included several of Ontario's amateur stars, he shot 67 and won by two strokes. Too shy to attend the awards dinner, he slipped away after finishing his round. A friend had to make apologies and bring him his prize.

Norman wasn't like the other golfers in the tournaments he played. For one thing, he played fast. He would sometimes lie down and pretend to sleep in the fairway, waiting for slower players to hit. "I always thought the day was going to come when I'd get penalized two strokes for playing too fast," he told me. "They had a meeting about it at one tournament. They said that people were complaining because they had taken off work to come to the tournament, and I was four under after five holes and they hadn't seen me hit a shot. They said, 'Please don't walk so abruptly to your ball. Walk like you're drunk.'"

At the Masters in 1956, Norman hit his first tee shot while the announcer was in the middle of introducing him. Asked by a playing partner why he took so little time to line up his shots, he said, "Why? Did they move the greens since yesterday?" He once putted between the foot and outstretched arm of a competitor who was marking his ball.

Norman's background also set him apart. Unlike most of the other top amateurs, he didn't belong to a country club. He often hitchhiked to and from tournaments, and he had to juggle his competitive schedule with a succession of dreary factory jobs, including one stitching rubber boots. He had to play hooky in order to compete in weekday tournaments, and he was fired five times. "There was no sense saying I was sick," he says, "because they'd read the headline NORMAN SHOOTS 65 AGAIN AND WINS." He liked night jobs best, because they left his days free for practice.

Norman also supported himself by selling the prizes he won in amateur events. As his confidence in his playing ability increased, he sometimes sold the prizes before the tournaments began. According to friends, on at least five occasions he intentionally finished second because his customers hadn't wanted the first-place prize. In 1955, with a birdie on the 39th hole in the final match, he won the Canadian Amateur--the first Canadian to do so since 1951. His victory was widely viewed as a fluke by those who felt that no one with such an unconventional swing and seemingly frivolous attitude could really play golf at the highest levels. But then the next year he won it again, and even more decisively. At the age of just 27, Norman had now laid the foundation for what might have been one of golf's greatest amateur careers. But his clowning on the golf course and his penchant for selling his prizes had long infuriated the RCGA. Taking money under the table was a common practice among amateurs, but no player was as open about it as Norman was. The RCGA threatened to strip him of his amateur status. Afraid that he would lose his two national titles, he announced he was turning pro.

This was harder than it sounded. He didn't have a club job and was an unlikely candidate for one, and thus could not qualify for a Canadian PGA Tour card. Finally, in 1958, under pressure from the public, and with the help of a driving-range pro who had hired Norman as an assistant, the CPGA relented. His first tournament as a card-carrying pro was the three-day Ontario Open. He shot 68-69-74 and won by three.

Norman's obvious next move was to the U.S. tour, to which he won a partial exemption with a third-place finish in a Canadian qualifying event. His U.S. debut took place at the 1959 Los Angeles Open, which was held that year at Rancho Municipal. He putted poorly--a recurrent affliction--but was thrilled to be playing alongside Hogan, Sam Snead and his other golf idols. He continued to play indifferently, with occasional flashes of brilliance (among them a 62 at the San Diego Open) until the tour reached New Orleans. There he shot four solid rounds, played in the final group on Sunday, led briefly, and finished fourth.

Gus and Audrey Maue were in Daytona, Fla., at that time. On Monday morning, Gus saw in the newspaper that Norman had played well and finished fourth. He predicted to his wife that Norman would win the following week in Pensacola.

"About two hours later," Maue told me, "there was a knock at my door, and it was Moe. I said 'Moe, why are you here? You're supposed to be in Pensacola.' And Moe said, 'I will never play that tour again.' I asked him what had happened, but he said he would never tell me. He was distraught.

"He would come over each night with six Cokes, and we would play cribbage until the wee hours, and the next morning Audrey would wake up and there would be Moe's six empty Coke bottles. His heart was broken, but he wouldn't talk about it; then he went back to Toronto. "A few weeks later, a young tour player I knew came through Daytona, and I asked him what had happened to Moe in New Orleans. He said that some of the big names on the tour--and I'm not going to say who--were upset that Moe was hitting the ball off the big tee, and they were upset with the way he dressed, and they didn't like his appearance. That's the bottom line."

Part Four

What had happened was that several well-known pros had cornered Norman in the locker room and chewed him out. They told him to stop clowning around, said he had to dress better and have his teeth fixed. It was a harrowing experience for someone who was already painfully shy and socially ill-at-ease, and Norman never went back. He doesn't like to talk about it now. When Maue told me the story, Norman looked at his feet and said quietly, "It stopped me from having fun." The conventional wisdom about Moe Norman's golf game is that he hits the ball extraordinarily well despite an extremely peculiar golf swing. "Moe's swing is not fundamentally sound," Bob Toski told me recently. "He gets away with it, I think, because by intuition and by instinct he played that way when he was young. He has great hand and eye coordination, and he has great hand and arm strength. But he doesn't have the posture of a good player, where the arms look more relaxed and hanging from the body. He has very little bend from his waist. I think he's another Lee Trevino--he's a freak. And I use the word in a complimentary sense. He learned his golf swing intuitively, he learned it by trial and error. He didn't understand the fundamentals.''

Trevino is an interesting comparison, because if you asked other pros to name the best ball-striker among active players, Trevino would get a lot of votes. Are he and Norman really freaks? Or could there possibly be an advantage to having a golf swing that doesn't look like Bob Toski's?

Similar thoughts occurred to a Chicago businessman named Jack Kuykendall. In the early '80s, Kuykendall was a middling middle-aged golfer with Walter Mittyish fantasies of making it as a pro. The senior tour was beginning to attract a lot of attention. Kuykendall's handicap was 12. At 44, he decided to devote the next six years of his life to finding out once and for all whether he had the right stuff to play for money on TV. Two years later, after many hours of hard work, Kuykendall's handicap was two strokes worse. Frustrated and discouraged, he decided the problem lay not in himself but in the golf swing. "I was convinced," he says, "that there had to be an easier way to hit a round object on the ground with a stick."

Kuykendall had been a physics major in college, and he had put in two years toward a master's before deciding there wasn't enough money in academics. Examining the golf swing from the point of view of basic physics, he decided the problem was the modern grip. Holding a golf club in the fingers, as virtually all golfers are taught to do, creates a complex mechanical system involving so many different angles, axes, and planes that for most players hitting the ball squarely is an accident, Kuykendall believed. He redesigned his golf swing based on the principles he had discovered. After a month of practice, Kuykendall told me, he shot three consecutive subpar rounds. The next day he started a company, which today is called Natural Golf.

Overthrowing the modern golf swing is a major undertaking. Kuykendall peddled his system for several years without much success. Then, one day, after a clinic in Florida, Kuykendall was approached by a Canadian pro named Mark Evershed. "Mark came up to me and said, 'You're talking about Moe Norman.' I still remember my reaction. I said, 'What's a Moe Norman?'" Evershed sent Kuykendall a videotape of Norman's swing, and Kuykendall was flabbergasted. Point by point Norman's swing matched the one he had devised.

"Scientifically, what Moe does is perfect," Kuykendall says. "It's what we call an ideal mechanically advantaged golf swing. It is maximum force with least effort. It's as perfect as a human being can do. Incidentally, the second best is Lee Trevino's. Most people think of his mechanics as unorthodox, but that's only because it's not what they're used to seeing. "But Lee Trevino and Moe Norman are very, very close in their swings. If Trevino moved his right hand under the club a little more, he and Moe Norman would be identical. The closest on tour right now would be Paul Azinger. He has a single-axis right-hand grip, like Moe's, but he also has something that hurts him--a super-strong left-hand grip. Moe's left-hand grip is about as weak as you can make it. Azinger, because of his strong left hand, has to block the ball by spinning his hips to get the clubface square at impact, to keep his left hand from shutting the clubface down. If he moved his left hand to neutral and stopped spinning his hips, he would be almost unbeatable. He would be Moe Norman."

Kuykendall set out to get in touch with Norman, but had no luck for two years. Norman seldom talks to people he doesn't know. Kuykendall persevered, though, and eventually Norman agreed to meet him in Florida, where Norman was spending the winter.

"I spent an hour going through the science with Moe," Kuykendall says. "When I finished, Moe stood up and pulled some film out of his pocket and threw it on the table. He said, 'Here, take this. You can help someone with it.' It was some old black-and-white pictures, from 1966, of what he called his best swing ever. He said, 'All my life I've wondered why I can do what I can do with a golf club. And you are the first person who ever explained it to me.'"

Meeting Kuykendall was a major turning point for Norman. Natural Golf pays Norman a modest fee for the use of his name and image, and he and Kuykendall conduct several dozen clinics a year. Their alliance led to an article in the Wall Street Journal last year, and the article caught the attention of Wally Uihlein, who is the president of Titleist and Foot-Joy Worldwide. Uihlein got in touch with Kuykendall and Gus Maue, and arranged to meet Norman at the 1995 PGA Merchandise Show.

"Mr. Uihlein told Moe that Titleist would like to shoot a video," Kuykendall told me, "so that his swing would never be lost. The Titleist booth had one of those big blocks of video monitors, and Moe said, 'Can I be on there next year? Can I be on there next year?' And Mr. Uihlein said he could."

Uihlein then told Norman that Titleist would like to pay him $5,000 a month for the rest of his life.

"Moe looked kind of funny," Kuykendall says. "He took a step backward and said, 'I've played your balls all my life. I've played your balls all my life. What do I have to do for that money?' And Mr. Uihlein said, 'You don't have to do anything. You've already done it. We just want to thank you for what you've already done.'

"Mr. Uihlein said that Moe was in the same league as Ben Hogan and Bobby Jones and that he deserved the same kind of respect. Moe didn't say anything. He just went kind of limp, and he almost went into shock. I thought he was going to pass out. By that time, the hair was standing up on my arms, and all of us who were there were about to cry. Moe and I had to go do a clinic right after that, and in the car on the way there, Moe said, 'Jack, I don't know if I can hit the ball.'"

The Titleist stipend has made a huge difference in Norman's life. He still lives in the same motel room, eats all his meals in inexpensive restaurants and keeps his clothes in the back seat of his car. But he doesn't have to worry about money anymore. Eight years ago, Norman told Gus Maue that he was worried he'd never be able to afford to get back to Florida, saying, with deep sorrow, "My days are through." Today, he can go anywhere he wants.

Even more important, Norman has finally received the kind of recognition that throughout his playing career he felt he was denied. He sometimes grumbles that his induction to the hall of fame came 20 years too late, but he is nonetheless pleased to be there. Recently, he has even begun to talk about returning to competitive golf, perhaps by playing some events on the U.S. senior tour.

Although the hall of fame induction was a great honor, most people who hear Norman's story end up feeling that a huge opportunity was missed. If circumstances had been different--if he'd had a sponsor, if he'd had a mentor, if other players had been kinder, if he had worked harder on his putting--could he have dominated the PGA Tour?

The more I think about it, though, the more I think the question misses the point. The most striking fact about Norman's competitive record is not that it falls short of Hogan's or Nelson's or anyone else's but that it exists at all, especially if Norman is disabled in anything like the way people who know him speculate that he may be.

Norman overcame gargantuan obstacles as a young man and then went public with a golf swing that provoked titters. He set out to learn how to hit a golf ball, and he worked at it until he could do it better than anyone else--maybe better than anyone else who ever lived. His succeeding required skill and courage and self-assurance on an almost inconceivable scale.

The difficulties Norman endured undoubtedly took a toll on him. "When the sun goes down," Gus Maue says, "Moe is a very, very lonely man. He goes back to his motel room and turns on the TV. He's fine during the day, because he can play golf, but at night he doesn't know what to do."

That's Maue talking, not Norman. Norman speaks freely about injustices he feels he's suffered, but he doesn't dwell on the dark side of his life. For all he's been through and all the hard times he has seen, it is not his sorrows that stand out.

Norman with a golf club in his hands looks to me like a happy man. Even back in the days when he practiced till his hands were bleeding, golf for him was a source of joy. It was that attitude, as much as anything, that got him into trouble with various authorities--as in the tournament in which he came to the final green with a three-stroke lead, intentionally putted into a bunker, and got up and down to win anyway. It was also that attitude that sustained him.

"Golf is to have fun," he told me toward the end of our conversation, repeating a theme he had brought up before. "What do you have to lose? A lousy ball, that's all. If you lose yours, grab another one out of your bag and hit it. That is what the game's about, and that is the first thing I was taught 55 years ago: have fun. Most golfers don't see the bright things. All they see is the bad things.

"But if you see the bad things, that's where your mind will take you. If you drive a car down the road and look at the sidewalk, where do you think you're going to put the car? It's the same thing on a golf course. People see only the trees and the water. But I don't. To me, they are only there as an ornament. They are there to make the course look nicer. All I see is the tee, the middle of the fairway, and the middle of the green. That's golf. I hit my 18 fairways and my 18 greens, and go on to the next day."

"Gee, Moe," I said, "it must be boring for you." "Like heck it is," Norman said. "That's fun."

Moe Norman Golf Academy

Sunday, March 8, 2009

默伊-诺曼



默伊-诺曼生前接受的最后采访

只有两位球员真正的控制着自己的挥杆

 老虎伍兹赢得第三个英国公开赛冠军以及第11个大满贯赛头衔最值得关注的一个方面,却是比赛结束之后人们最为忽视的一个方面:老虎伍兹不再花过多口舌解释他的高尔夫挥杆。
  第135届英国公开赛的话题变成了老虎伍兹的父亲厄尔五月份去世之后,他如何独自撑起一片天空。在这种情绪激荡的时刻,人们的确容易忘记那个帮助他实现新辉煌的挥杆。/p>
  可是刚刚在一年前,也就是老虎伍兹赢得第二个英国公开赛的时候,他才平息了人们对他新挥杆的质疑。这一新挥杆开始于2003年,是在教练汉克-哈尼指导下完成的。甚至在2005年美国名人赛夺取冠军之后,老虎伍兹仍然没有躲过人们对他的批评。那场比赛,老虎伍兹赢得的确很艰难。他在最后两洞吞下柏忌,不得不与迪玛科展开延长赛。幸好,加洞赛第一洞的那只小鸟帮助老虎伍兹封锁了绿茄克,也及时解除了他的大满贯赛冠军荒。老虎伍兹与以前哈蒙帮助建立起来的那种密不透风的挥杆姿势有了迥然的不同。批评者在这中间发现了漏洞。
  圣安德鲁斯媒体中心的景象非常热烈。人们明显想知道老虎伍兹挥杆嬗变的情况。汉克-哈尼的身旁站满了记者。在帮助这个时代最伟大的球员找回了夺冠的威力,汉克-哈尼终于觉得自己获得了解脱、证明。不用说,老虎伍兹再次获得了世界第一,而且继续保持在那里,时间已经达到了406周。
  “现在,当然,我是一个聪明人了。”汉克-哈尼去年七月份笑着说。
  从哈蒙转到哈尼这一决定在2004年看起来并不明智。那一年,老虎伍兹只赢得了一场比赛,维杰-辛格取代他成为了新的世界第一。可是在事业的顶峰时期,老虎伍兹有理由做这么重大的改变。
  就像这个运动中的其他运动员一样,老虎伍兹总是觉得自己能更好,尽管他已经赢得了8个大满贯赛冠军(包括2000年到2001年连赢四个),与哈蒙合作时取得了39场胜利。在哈蒙的帮助下,老虎伍兹变得非常犀利,就像八、九十年代他帮助诺曼成为世界第一时一样。
  1996年,老虎伍兹转为职业球员那一刻,他的挥杆已经很成熟了,可是还不够规整。他的距离控制存在污点,同他的精确性一样。可是通过大的弧线,以及强劲的力量,老虎伍兹仍能够挥出非凡的杆头速度。他在1997年美国名人赛上占据着主动地位。以12杆优势夺取了冠军,他还创造了赛事270杆纪录。很显然这正是老虎伍兹初出道时挥杆的产物。老虎伍兹随后也承认那一周偶然性很强,主要是动力和时机结合得很巧妙。
  老虎伍兹与哈蒙自从1993年开始就惺惺相惜,可是哈蒙的对老虎伍兹挥杆的锤炼直到1998年才实施。在哈蒙的帮助下,老虎伍兹终于对抗住了这项运动的艰难。2000年,他总共赢得了九场比赛,包括年度最后三场大满贯赛。在20场比赛中,他没有一场高于标准杆。老虎伍兹创造了或者平了美巡赛27项纪录,包括未经修订的平均杆数68.33杆(修订后为67.79),破了1945年拜伦-尼尔森所创造的纪录。
  老虎伍兹离开哈蒙的阵营转向哈尼看上去没有一丝道理。唯一说的通的是哈蒙所创立的挥杆对体力消耗很大,即便是对于世界上最强健的高尔夫球员也有点过分了。最大的损害在老虎伍兹左膝盖的受伤上显示出来。2002年年末,老虎伍兹不得不为此动手术。
  孩童时滑雪板以及自行车事故已经对老虎伍兹的膝盖造成了损伤。当老虎伍兹努力追求额外的10到20码距离时,他需要对膝盖提出了更高的要求。事实上,到2002年,膝盖问题已经成为老虎伍兹不得不解决的当务之急,否则他将很难超越尼克劳斯的18个大满贯赛头衔纪录。
  进入哈尼以及他的同一挥杆平面理论。作为马克-欧米拉长期的教练,汉克-哈尼相信最优秀的挥杆需要从头到尾保持同一平面角度。这一理论应用到老虎伍兹的身上,他的挥杆更加平滑而圆润。在老虎伍兹想采取这一新理论的过程中,他不得不与原来的旧习惯相抗衡。他的精确性以及他的自信心都在衰减,尽管在更改过程中,他连续晋级记录就始终延伸着。这一点也显示出老虎伍兹的整体高尔夫能力以及顽强的斗志。
  2004年,人们对老虎伍兹的挥杆持续提出疑问的时候,老虎伍兹就始终表达着他对这一决定的满意。“我曾经有过二心吗?没有!”老虎伍兹在2005年年初说,“我先退后进,然后大踏步前进。”
  在汉克-哈尼的指导下,老虎伍兹减轻了他的膝盖伤痛,开始在后挥杆以及下挥杆上努力。去年五场胜利,两个大满贯赛头衔证明了这一决定的正确性。现在老虎伍兹又多赢了六场比赛,其中包括第二个英国公开赛冠军和一个美国PGA锦标赛冠军。当然在2006年,他也第一次在大满贯赛上被淘汰。可是美国公开赛的失利有很大程度上可以解释为他父亲去世对他的负面影响。
  “我有充足的时间做准备。”老虎伍兹谈到翼脚高尔夫俱乐部举行的美国公开赛时说,“我只是没有很好地去执行。”
  老虎伍兹在霍伊莱克肯定执行得很好。他的开球上球道率为85.7%。这是阵容中最高的一个数值,也达到了他职业生涯的最高。另外,他的标准杆上果岭率为80.6%,也相当出色。就像2000年在圣安德鲁斯取胜一样,老虎伍兹坚持了自己的比赛策略,将一号木始终放在球包中,整周下来巧妙地避免着皇家
利物浦的沙坑。
  “我知道自己的技术已经接近了我在大满贯赛上所需要的程度。”老虎伍兹说,“当我达到那一点,我的技术每一天都在好转。这正是你想要坚持的东西。”
  是对距离的控制,而不是他出名的力气使得老虎伍兹再次无法征服。也正是由于距离控制,老虎伍兹才转投了哈尼。胜利是衡量一个球员的最好工具。老虎伍兹世界范围内已经赢得了60场胜利,包括12个大满贯赛头衔。在大满贯赛冠军榜上,他现在唯一落后的是尼克劳斯。
  “只有两位球员真正的控制着自己的挥杆:默伊-诺曼(Moe Norman)和本-侯根。”老虎伍兹对《高尔夫文摘》说,“我也想拥有自己的挥杆。也只有这样,我才会满足。”
  换句话说,老虎伍兹现在仍在磨砺进步之中。

两不同平面挥杆都正确 不混淆彼此基本要素

一个平面的挥杆,肩膀在倾斜的平面上转动,手臂的挥动围绕并横过胸部。


两个平面的挥杆,站位相对比较直一点,转动比较水平,手臂挥动相对比较陡直。 区别在何处?



肩膀的转动总是围绕脊柱,那么其必定在一个平面上运动。身体从髋关节开始的弯曲越多,肩膀的平面就会越陡直。如果身体直立,肩膀水平转动,则平面看起来就像是肩膀高度的旋转木马。如果身体弯曲90度,看起来又会像一个费雷斯大转轮。

与肩膀相比,手臂的挥动只有两种选择。要么与肩膀的转动保持在一个平面上,要么在另外一个平面上。因此我把肩膀的挥动和肩膀的转动在一个平面的挥杆称作“一个平面的挥杆”,而将手臂的挥动和身体转动在不同平面的挥杆称作“两个平面的挥杆”。

吉姆· 哈蒂(Jim Hardy)是一位在高尔夫挥杆方面知识博学的教练,你也许从来都没有听说过他。我能够这样自信地说他是最优秀的教练之一,是因为我曾和你所听说过的所有教练合作过,而吉姆的确让我值得尊敬。1992 年,父亲的去世让我几乎丧失了对高尔夫比赛的欲望。是吉姆的建议和指导帮助我渡过了职业生涯最艰难的时光,并重返PGA 赛场。

1993 年,在吉姆的建议下,我决定将原本两个平面的挥杆改为一个平面。下面的文章是摘自吉姆出版的《The Swing Truth for Golfer》。这本书讲述的是一个挥杆平面与两个挥杆平面之间的区别和各自的基本原理,以及为什么不能将二者的基本原理混淆的原因。

你将在后边几页看到我所展示的一个平面和两个平面的连续动作。我认为自己有资格来展示,因为在职业生涯的早期,我用的是两个平面的挥杆方法,随后又换成了一个平面。虽然无法与过尼克劳斯的辉煌战绩相媲美,但我还是在1995 年拿到过2 次冠军。2003 年,我又在49 岁的时候拿到了一个冠军,在2004 年的夏天更是成为了美国常青公开赛的冠军。不过我觉得在挥杆方面还有很多方面有待完善,吉姆认为我对于挥杆方法的改变是成功的。

吉姆并没有以职业教练为生,因此你可能不会经常在电视上看到他。所以这篇文章以及他所编写的书是你认识他的一个好机会。同时我也希望你们能够喜欢这个重要的部分。我相信吉姆的挥杆理论将是自本· 霍根的《The Morden Fundamentals of Golf 》之后的又一次革命。努力研究、认真学习、享受乐趣,并祝你好运。

彼得·雅各布森(Peter Jacobsen),PGA 巡回赛球员

汉克-哈尼说候根的一个平面是错的,应该是同一个平面角度。

Tuesday, March 3, 2009

Sunday, March 1, 2009

Bush Harmon 布奇哈蒙: 改造挥杆十戒

在练习场上,定下你的目标;在球场上,放下你的自我。

改造挥杆十戒
1 你的击球告诉你是否要改造
2 寻求专业帮助
3 要有决心
4 小修补不是改造
5 如果很顺利,可能没做对
6 用慢动作来练习
7 好的节奏很重要
8 勇于在比赛中实践
9 不能丢了短球技术
10 着眼于目标

勇于实践

避免膝盖弯曲过度

Tip Plus: Ben Curtis

Swing Sequence: Ben Curtis

问题:造成上体过直,上杆时过早向内移动。

Leadbetter 戴维利百特: 挥杆7要诀

挥杆7要诀
挥杆前握杆转身节奏